Districts throughout the country spend billions of dollars each year on technology: hardware, software, network infrastructure, Web-based services, professional development. Is the expenditure worth it? Why or why not?
I believe that technology is very important in public education. I am lucky to work at a school where technology is an important part of the school's culture. We have four labs that each house 32 computers. When we were doing the online computer test, we would test two teams at a time. Rather than taking weeks to get all of our students tested, it took 3 days. Last year, we even tested all of our 7th graders. With the new writing assessment for 7th grade, our teachers (4) can take their classes down to the computer labs to type their papers. Papers are written and printed out in two days rather than finishing them whenever the teacher can sign up for the lab. Every classroom at my school has an activ board and LCD projector, as well as the remotes that students use to input answers and every teacher has a laptop. People in positions like mine have docking stations for their laptops with flatscreen monitors that are large. Printers are in every office, and every team has a printer in one of the rooms on their team. We use technology in many ways at our school including posting assignments for parents, newsletters, correspondence, creating powerpoints, accessing Renzulli Learning which all of our students use in Science, and posting forms and lesson plans to our Carrington staff folder for employees to access when they are looking for something specific. I definitely feel that the expenditure for technology is well worth it!
Technology is worth it when there is a "professional development plan" for the end users. In a lot of situations, teachers are given technological tools without the training and then are expected to "learn" the technology on their own. Some will. Most will not.
If you are going to spend the money, please include funds for ongoing professional development.
Yes, technology is a worthy investment for school districts. In an effect to ensure fiscal accountability, the district should establish processes and procedures that justify expenditures. The district’s Office of Professional Development should provide all of the professional development opportunities for technology. Moreover, teachers should use technology to perform their daily routine responsibilities, deliver classroom instruction, and engage student in learning through hands-on experiences.
I agree with others that technology is a good investment for teachers and students if the technology is actually utilized. One of the best ways to ensure use is by providing professional development so that teachers understand how to effectively improve instruction by using technology for student engagement, data tracking and analysis, etc. I also think that careful thought and consideration should be given when considering when new technology will be provided within a school or district to ensure that money is not being wasted.
I am going to be brave here and say that no, technology is currently not worth the billions that we are putting into it. There are several points that support my opinion, but as an elementary school teacher, I will say that technology is not too useful if students are lacking basic skills to interface with it. Once students have these basic social and academic skills, go for it. However, from my experience, I see students who can not even decode words properly act all to eagerly to get on the computer and put the cart before the horse. And even in this example, yes, there are programs that help with this skill, but from my experience, they are not always successful. I think that as educators, we need to use a variety of instructional modes and not be too quick to jump on the bandwagon of the "latest and greatest" technological tool to improve student achievement. Once we have those basic academic skills, like critical thinking, we can learn how to integrate technology. How many of you went to school in the days before computers were everywhere? You did just fine, didn't you? The reason for that is that you were equipped with basic learning and thinking skills so that once you encountered a new object, material, or concept, you were able to integrate it into your prior knowledge.
Camille: I am jealous of all the computer labs you have. We have one lab, and benchmarks/computer based assessments mean the computer lab is not available for instructional purposes for at least a month.
Keith: I understand and agree with your assessment that most teachers will not use the tools. I believe the avoidance to integrate technology by educators makes the administrators job to keep them accountable even more important. If the administrator emphasizes and models the importance of technology, then expectations to see technology in the classroom will only help the students. Unfortunately, not all admin's follow through on the accountability aspect.
I have an interactive classroom. My instructional differentiation has reached unimaginable heights due to the technology I have. I also believe it has directly contributed to my students' success on the 8th Grade Science EOG. So, based upon my experience, I definitely think the expenditure on technology is worth it.
We live in a technology driven world where knowing how to interact with technology is becoming a necessary basic skill. Therefore, technology should be integrated as much as possible to prepare students for the world that we live in. I personally did not have much experience with technology in school but there was also not a self-check out at the grocery store or computer-based job applications. Some technology is not appropriate in every environment and will likely not yield the results that we (educators) would like. However, there are tools that can be utilized that make lessons more relevant and provide hands-on ways for students to engage in material. I believe that these tools are needed and worth the investment.
I also went from a school that provided an LCD projector for every classroom to a school that provides one per team. This may not seem like much but I have to tell you that it does make a difference. There are so many neat things available on the web that are useful in the classroom. I miss being able to jump on at any moment and show my students something from the internet that is relevant to my lesson.
Technology supports the learning environment at my school tremendously. Some of the ways would include Renzulli Learning. Our students are learning so much about themselves and how they like to learn, as well as being directed to worthwhile websites that enhance whatever they are learning in their classrooms. Another way is the use of the activ board by the teachers and the students. In a math class, for a teacher to be able to click on one little icon and then draw any geometric shape she needs is amazing. We do who units on our laptops and then use our projectors to share with the class. Having an author read a book aloud while the book is on the activ board is very cool. The kids love the way the pages turn with the readers voice. We are provided with extensive professional development on all that can be done with this technology, and at every staff meeting, a teacher shows us something he /she has discovered that we might not have found yet. Great use of money at my school!
I must agree with what Justin has posted. Often it seems, technology is purchased and a plan is created for implementing it within the school. Take for instance the implementation of Smartboards. In some schools that I have read about, teachers have received Smartboards and training. The training has taught teachers to "use" the program. As I read about what teachers are "doing" with the technology, it seems as if instead of writing on a "twentieth century" whiteboard, that teachers are writing on a "digital" white board and showing movie clips on a larger screen. Technology staff development must go beyond learning to simply "use" the technology. Instead technology professional development must help teachers to design instruction that better engages students than typical instructional strategies. Furthermore, teachers not only need to use the technology to improve and enhance instruction but also need the skills necessary to empower students to meaningfully utilize the technology. Until systems and ongoing resources are designed to facilitate the meaningful inclusion of technology, it seems to me that money could be better spent in other areas.
Yes, it is worth it. I agree with many of the responses already. How else are we going to prepare our students to be globably competitive in the 21st century? We live in a world now where practically everything that we do requires the use of technology. We would be doing our students an injustice if we did not consider this to be a big investment that is absolutely needed. Not only that, but teachers and principals should model the use of it. I do agree, however, that there must be procedures in place to hold teachers and principals accountable and to justify the need. I agree with Amatullah in saying that some technology is not appropriately fitted for every classroom, and therefore we must be careful that it will enhance and not hinder learning.
Justan, I agree that there are some basic concepts and skills that students simply cannot get through the use of technology. Again, we must make sure that we are using technology to enhance learning. As a computer teacher,I see this daily where students do not have the basic reading, writing and math skills and what a challenge it becomes when the course curriculum requires that they be able to create and format letters, read sample stories in training computers for speech recognition and create spreadsheets using formulas.
Also, having classroom management software in my lab makes it somewhat better because now students are not distracted as much with the internet.
I agree that when technology is used correctly it can be beneficial. I, like Brianna, have seen teachers use their Activ Boards as glorified white boards, and it is sad because it is such a waste. I have also seen teachers be very effective with their white boards. I believe that it all depends on how they are used. At our school we have two computer labs with twenty five computers in them each, and we also have two lap top carts that can be checked out for use in the classroom. There has also been talk of creating another lab for strict use in implementing Renzulli with classes. It worries me, though, because technology is very expensive and so many students do not know the fundamentals of using computers, and, once again, it seems to be a waste of money. If students were to be efficient with technology, then I would agree that money used would be worth it.
I tend to lean more towards Justin's thinking. While I believe technology can be a great tool, I rarely see it used to actually support student learning, any more than the glorified white board.
I think we could use computers to differentiate instruction and stop tracking kids into segregated classrooms, but that doesn't seem to be happening. I did see computers used for online college classes which was cool. And in a charter school they had independent testing programs that gave students immediate feedback. But I have yet to see that used in the regular public schools. When I asked teachers in Durham about the program (I forget the name at the moment) they had not heard of it.
I don't know, so this is a question for HS teachers...do the schools offer any computer programming or web page design programs?
Finally, while seeing the pictures of a book has benefits, I'd rather get professional development on storytelling.
I agree with the others that technology is a worthy investment for school districts. When technology is integrated in the curriculum I think it helps the students in the learning process since they are engaged in high order thinking and problem solving. Technology also promotes project based learning. I know that there are situations when districts spend tons of money on technology and it gets wasted. For example, when smart/active boards are in classrooms and the teachers do not know how to work them. (The teachers are waiting for the training.) Also, I know of situations where the schools have purchased licenses for programs like Accelerated Reader and the teachers have no idea the program exists. Amatullah, I agree there should be thought and consideration given of when, how and to whom new technology will be provided within a school or district to ensure that money is not wasted.
I have to agree with Justin, I do not think that the amount of money spent each year on technology is worth it. Justin makes a really good point about how most of us learned without technology when we were in school. I never used a computer on a daily basis until my freshmen year in college. I think that people are under the assumption that the amount of money spent on technology each year equals smarter students, brighter futures, and more opportunities. Although I’m sure there might be evidence somewhere that validates this point, I strongly feel that the fundamentals of good ole hard work, discipline, and parental accountability are far less expensive, and much more beneficial.
While the money being spent on technology may be exorbitant, I still believe the technology can be a tremendous asset to student learning. I guess my argument is not necessarily whether the students have the basic skills to utilize the technology, but more on how much teachers are employing the tools. I realize that technology is not the only way to deliver effective instruction, especially since most of us were educated without technology. As Debra said, the world these kids live in has become completely full of gadets/technology which further supports education with on their terms. IF used appropriately with some lesson preparedness, then technology enhances daily instruction dramatically. Furthermore, as a future administrator will you hold people accountable for using the technology that is available? Will you not integrate technology and become part of this new movement in educating today's youth? How will you use your allotment of technological funds if you do not believe technology is worth it?
I agree with all who have stated that educators must be held accountable concerning technology. There are certainly situations in which technology purchases are irresponsible - mainly because teachers do not receive training or understand how it relates to the standard course of study. That said, I had the opportunity to witness firsthand how technology can improve education. I observed Hillside New Tech for a day last month. I saw freshmen teams developing a website that focused on their earth science lessons. The teams communicate with each other about collaborative projects over email. They develop presentations using Macs in English class. I know it's costly, and most schools cannot afford these resources, but these students are better prepared that many to compete globally after graduation.
I like Adam's reframing of the question as focusing on how technology can support the learning environment (you'll hear much more from him on Wednesday).
Several people have mentioned anecdotal examples of technology being used effectively in the classroom to extend learning opportunities. Here's my next question: were those examples about the technology or about the teacher? Without the technology, would those teachers have still figured out effective ways for students to learn?
I guess my point boils down to this question: does technology make teachers more effective (does it support learning environments across the board), or is it only effective in the hands of an effective teacher, who was already going to achieve high levels of learning anyway?
Technology is only a waste if it is not properly used to its full potential. From my experience technology is used more at the secondary level than the elementary level. I have observed numerous elementary classroom teachers and rarely is technology used, unless you are including overhead projectors as technology. I have yet to see an elementary teacher utilizing a Smart Board in their classroom, but I know that the schools have them. It all boils down to the teachers in the school and if they see any value in using technology. Just as some people try to keep up with the Jones, some schools try to keep up with other schools that have the latest technology gadgets. Just as others have stated accountability is key here along with properly training the staff on how to use it. There are schools out there with Smart Boards that are not being used. Why do we keep them then? Sell them to a school that really utilizes them or continue to have it sit in the corner as an after thought in hope that someone will use it.
Technology is a tool. A tool is only as good as the person using it. A basketball in my hands is just recreational but in the hands of LeBron James it is millions of dollars. Same basketball, different people, therefore technology can only be effective in the hands of an effective teacher.
Of course the money spent on technology is worth it! I have seen in my lifetime how technology has tremendously impacted education. The internet has developed to become a major vehicle for educational research for students as well as an avenue for intstruction (blackboard for example). Also, cell phones have become a major issue and part of life in our school changing our discipline policies and the things we have to deal with. Technology is shrinking boundary lines and making communication faster and easier to transact business and do everything and our kids need to know technology to keep up educationally. School districts should certainly keep spending money.
I think technology can make a teacher more effective, but I do believe a teacher can be effective without technology. As Lamont said, technology is a tool. However, a critical tool...
It's so critical for teachers and students to keep up with technology because of its widespread use in our world. Our world is now so fast-paced and wanting instant gratification and technology aids this.
For instance, a teacher can and should teach students to do math without technology, i.e. with formulas, proofs, etc. However, the calculator made everything so much easier. Many students now will not or feel they cannot do math without a calculator. Thus, techonolgy has impacted our students' view of education and we teachers have to educate them based on their view.
I hope this makes sense, but I think we must use techonogy because it is so entranched in these new generations of students.
Dr. G., you said, "I guess my point boils down to this question: does technology make teachers more effective (does it support learning environments across the board), or is it only effective in the hands of an effective teacher, who was already going to achieve high levels of learning anyway?" I think that technology does make teachers more effective across the board, IF, as Matt stated the teachers take responsibility for the technology. If you have an activ board, and refuse to go to the training and/or try some of the newfangled ideas with your students, than, no, it's not worth it. At my school, we have some very effective teachers who are afraid of all technology! So, even though they have access to this technology, they choose not to use it. In my opinion, technology does enhance classrooms and learning if the teachers will learn how to use effectively, and will use it for more than showing movies. Students are "turned on" by technology, so we as educators should be using it just to show how important technology is in their world, and how like us, they will have opportunities to grow and learn as they become productive adults. My students still can't believe that calculators and CDs didn't exist when I was their age. Camille
I think that technology is needed in the classroom as students will need to know how to utilize technology, especially in today’s society where it dominates every aspect of life. However, I do not feel that technology should be the center or focus of student’s learning. In other words, students should not be made to rely heavily on technology. I think that teachers are not doing a good job of teaching students the basic formulas, concepts, and skills because they are letting the calculators and computers do the thinking for the students. Some teachers, (young teachers) are taught in college to rely heavily on technology, so they know no other way to teach. Therefore, the teachers are not equipped to assist students based solely on what they know; instead, they have to run to the computer for help. In the prehistoric days before computers and TI-83 Calculators, teachers were proficient in their subject area and could teach well without the use of multiple gadgets and the students learned and did well relying on their own intellect.. While understandably the government wants students to be able to compete in a global and technological society, they are creating students who rely heavily on electronic tools because the curriculum has been dumb down. On one hand, the government is helping students and teachers to be technology savvy, but on the other hand, the government is creating technology junkies who would be lost and incapable without technology. So, I’m straddling the fence on this issue. I think it is worth the expenditure but not to the magnitude that it has become.
To answer Dr. G's question, I think technology makes good teachers better and makes bad teachers lazy because now they have something to hide behind rather than perfecting their craft so that they can be skilled with or without technology.
Does technology improve students' abilities to read, write, think, and problem solve? Does technology improve test scores? Does technology create active or passive learners? If the answers to these questions are "no”,” maybe", or "don't know" then I would argue that the expenditures for technology are not worth it. If the number one factor in student achievement is effective teachers, then we need to invest in human resources not infrastructure and hardware. I understand that technology is important to being productive members of the 21st century, but I have a hard time thinking that technology is the panacea to all of the schools' problems when the average high school student cannot read and comprehend a user manual. It seems that technology has become a tangible investment in education and has become the essential aid in improving student achievement. School Boards and other politicians appropriate money for technology and then brag and boast in their campaign rhetoric that their schools have x number of computer labs, smart boards, LCD projectors and so on. As Keith pointed out, if the purchase of technology does not include funding and a plan for staff development then it will not be used effectively. A recent study at Duke showed that student test scores dropped from their 4th grade scores to their 8th grade scores after they acquired computers and internet access during the interim. Technology is a tool that used properly can help effective teachers; used improperly it can be a distraction that hinders learning.
Let me clarify something because I feel that my comments made be misconstrued as if I'm against technology usage in classrooms; I'm not against technology usage at all. Of course students need to know how to operate and utilize technology, especially in this society; however I'm against technology being overused to the point that it handicaps students and makes them dependent upon it to the point that they can not think for themselves.
In reframing the question, the answer seems be that technology is not worth the cost. If most people agree that technology does not improve average or poor teaching, then is giving poor or average teachers a smart board going to help them improve student scores? As a teacher at a school with older infrastructure, I would laugh when new teachers from newer schools come in and complain because they did not have a piece of equipment they “could not teach without”. What is a better activity for a child; to watch TV (use technology) or have a book read to them? Which is better the novel or the movie based on the novel? Does using a computer to teach writing help a student who does not know how to type? When I began teaching we used filmstrip projectors, overhead projectors, 16mm movie projectors, copy machines, and mimeograph machines. Students learned the majority of their content from reading books, taking notes, listening to lectures and discussions. The students I teach today are technologically savvy with their Ipods, cell phones and texting, but they struggle to read the textbook that is appropriate for their grade level. How is technology helping them? They have become dependent on technology to the point that even my “honor” students do not understand that cutting and pasting from Wikipedia and other websites to their research paper is plagiarism when they do not quote and cite the paragraphs they borrow. Matt gave an ideal example of how technology should look when used properly in a classroom; but until more students are at grade level in their basic skills, the school expenditure in technology is just another example of throwing money at the problems of education. I am not a Luddite, but I do feel that the educational system has been duped by the educational supply companies and technology companies into believing that technology will make us smarter. Technology does not make us smarter it makes some things easier and more efficient.
To answer Dr. G. I do not believe that technology makes better teachers. I think the astute teacher will use technology to support learning in her or his classroom, but without technology, s/he will find other ways to support learning.
What I find amazing is that most students are why ahead of me with programming IPODS, downloading music, using the social structures of technology but many have read less than 1 complete book/year. And, as I beieve it was Paul that pointed this out, would be hard pressed to read the instruction manual.
While computers (our primary technology in the classroom) may make things easier for students and teachers - and are great for communication and editing, it does not seem they are helping them learn how to learn.
To the original question, "Is the expenditure worth it? Why or why not?"
It is worth it as long as we're not buying technology just for the sake of buying technology.
Does that make sense?
In other words, it's not just HAVING smartboard technology in every single classroom, but actually using it in a meaningful way in our instruction. It is all in how you utilize it, but technology has the capacity to be extremely impactful to both the student and teacher.
To Dr. G's second question...IF technology alone were enough to make teachers (both the good and the bad) more effective, then we could probably just take attendance, fire up the data projector, press play on the Powerpoint, leave the room, and every child would be successful. Right? Doesn't work that way.
An effective teacher is going to be effective regardless of the technology (or lack thereof) in their classroom.
In response to Dr. Graham’s question, I do think that technology can make teachers more effective. However, I also think that there are several other components that contribute to teacher effectiveness. The scope of technology just seems to have a much larger impact on how teachers can teach. Lastly, if technology is not accompanied with staff development, teachers cannot be held accountable for not using it within their classrooms.
The big issue with me and for me as a future building level administrator is having staff development with the technology to assist the teacher in the delivery of his or her curriculum.
I would also encourage the teachers to design "instructions that are engaging" (thanks Briana) before going wild with technology in the classroom.
As it has been stated by others, technology is just a tool to assist teachers in the delivery of the curriculum. It should not be a "replacement" for effective teaching.
To Dr. G's last question, I agree with Lamont. The right tool in the right hands can work wonders. And the right tool in the hands of an effective teacher, will allow that teacher to do so much more within the classroom and with the students, time permitting.
The fact is that we live in a technology-driven world. As educators, I believe one of our jobs is to prepare our students to be productive citizens. Due to the fact that our lives and jobs are SO technology driven, part of preparing our students to be productive citizens is exposing them to and teaching them about technology. Some of our students would not have access to technology if they did not have exposure in school. Therefore, I believe that they money that we spend on technology is necessary.
I wholeheartedly agree with the theme of the comments being made. Technology rarely improves teacher effectiveness. Good teachers can teach effectively using technology and less effective teachers are no more effective with technology that without it. (Has anyone proven this true when a server goes down?)
Even with my agreement with the essence of this discussion, here is an idea that challenges my opinions. Two years ago, I heard David Warlick speak. (davidwarlick.com) Warlick is a public speaker and technology teacher. The essence of his message was that students today are different. We are preparing them to be successful in a world that will require them to use technology that we cannot yet fathom. Although we (quality teachers) can be effective without fully utilizing technology in everything we teach and facilitate, is this fair to students? By not more fully utilizing digital movies, allowing cell phone texting, teaching all lessons with a smartboard component, providing ipods, etc., are we not, in some way, preventing students from existing and communicating in a way that is defining to them?
(This is my recollection of a keynote address I heard Warlick give.)
Although I agree effective teaching is not fully dependent on technology, even in the twenty first century, by not gravitating more and more to utilizing technology, could it be possible that we are missing the opportunity to connect with kids "where they are" and in the technological world they have known their entire lives?
I'm curious if anyone else is "wrestling" with this conundrum.
It is not that I think that we should not invest in technology at all. However, I do feel that our LEVEL of investment is too high. There are other things that we could do to improve student achievement that we know would have a positive effect besides buying additional technology beyond our current level. We could spend those funds for capital improvement, class size reductions, more professional development for teachers, experiential learning for students (field trips), and the list could go on and on. I think that Dr. G. brought up a good point. Is technology going to make a mediocre teacher great? I think the odds are against that. In that case, you end up with a so so teacher with excellent technology that is in their classroom that is never used. I do agree with several classmates that development is critical--teachers must recieve training, support, and TIME to think of ways to integrate the resources they have been given.
We must remember that technology is not the END, but a means to an end. However, it is not the ONLY way to get to the end of student achievement.
I think that Justin has a valid point. Although I still believe it is our obligation to prepare our students to be global citizens, I do think we have to be careful how we spend our money. We need to fund the basics: computers for the school, LCD projectors (which, in my opinion, is a basic), etc.
I am not a proponent of outfitting every classroom with a Smartboard (or something similar), because, as Justin said, I do not think that such technology makes a mediocre teacher great. I DO, however, think that technology can make a GOOD teacher BETTER. I think we need to be careful about the technology that we buy, and be sure that we are placing it in the hands of teachers and staff that will USE it to benefit student achievement. We need to be careful not to fall prey to the latest fad, and instead, make wise choices about the needs of the school, the staff, and the students. I think those needs will vary by building, and part of being an effective leader is being able to diagnose those needs.
As usual, it all depends. It seems like many of us have very different opinions about the value of technology. As a high school math teacher I would love to have access to more technology. For instance, Texas Instruments sells a Navigator System that allows teachers to view the graphing calculator screens for 32 students. Teachers are able to check for mastery at all times. The cost...$3,750. Is it worth it? What if 1 student passes the EOC because of this technology? What about 2? What about 5? The technology issue raises challenges that are common in education. It's difficult to measure success, the purpose of education is unclear, and there is a great disconnect among teachers, researchers and policy makers.
To answer Adam’s question—technology can support the learning environment greatly, when used the right way. Students will learn without technology, and teachers can teach without it, but why would you want to do that? Not only does it not make sense, but it only impairs the learning of the students in the long run. They need to know how to do the basic fundamentals on a computer, so why not start while they are in school instead of producing students who are not ready for a technological driven society?
I think that, as Abbey said, our students need to be prepared for the world we are sending them in, and that requires basic (or more) use of technology. When looking at the statistics of my school, less than a half of the students have an actual computer in their house, and of those less than half have access to the internet. I know they are elementary school children, but this is where the basics of technology are learned. By giving them this exposure at school, we are preparing them for what's to greet them in the real world. I believe that the money we spend on them for this purpose is worth it, as long as the teachers are using it effectively, which is (or should be) a requirement for everyone. Schools that spend exorbitant amounts of money on technology should be able to justify that the teachers know how to use the items for the benefits of the students.
In response to Dr. G’s question, I think that technology is only effective in the hands of an effective teacher who is already achieving high levels of learning. I think teachers should only use technology to enrich skills and objectives they have already taught and students have mastered. These are the teachers that use technology for project based activities. In response to Lamont’s comment, “I have observed numerous elementary classroom teachers and rarely is technology used, unless you are including overhead projectors as technology.” I also have observed numerous elementary teachers. I have seen other forms of technology being used such as the alpha smarts, PowerPoint and smart boards. I agree that it boils down to the teachers in the school and if they see any value in using the technology that is available to them.
I think that article on disruptive technology makes a lot of sense. I've become a little (very little) familiar with the i-schools, which are online high schools (yes, in Idaho :-)) and I see that concept is becoming more widespread. My concern is that those programs are mainly reaching kids who parents have a certain amount of resources, already. My hope is that we find a way to provide those programs to kids that may have more difficulty with access
Because technology (1) provides teachers with an additional opportunity to differentiate classroom instruction, (2) increases student engagement, (3) mastery must be demonstrated for high school graduation, and (4) prepares students for success in higher education, I believe that technology makes teachers more effective across the board.
It seems as though every time I throw out a question on just about any topic, one of the answers is "Well, we definitely need to make sure we give teachers adequate professional development on this." When is all this awesome professional development going to occur? Who's going to pay for it? Who's going to sit through it? How psyched would you be if your principal was throwing a new series of workshops at you every month? The research is pretty clear that professional development is rarely effective in changing behaviors, it costs a lot of money, and it takes a lot of time. Be careful of falling into the trap of thinking that any problem or issue can be solved with a little professional development.
Second thought. A 2nd grade teacher with 25 students is hard-pressed to provide differentiated learning opportunities for every child. But a high-quality software program can easily customize a learning experience for individual kids, and K-12 software is getting better all the time. Is that the future of technology? Is that where we should be spending technology dollars?
I think that technology should be like all educational tools and be individualized. Obviously college prep students need the technology to compete and effectively complete research projects compared to our international counterparts. I also agree with Paul though in that we are spending billions of dollars on some of our students who will never own a computer and are struggling to read and write on grade level. Of course the big problem with educational tools is that they become trendy. Everyone has to have a PC. Everyone has to have a Mac. I remember a few years ago, everyone needed a palm pilot. The trends come and go and while the college bound students need to keep up with current trends, our struggling students need someone to invest in reading programs and tutors to help them learn some basic skills to compete in this changing world.
Dr. G, I think that an effective teacher can customize a differentiated learning experience without a high-quality software program. I hope the future of technology is not just for customizing individual learning experiences. I think that the technology money should be spent on remediation programs for low performing students.
Dr. G's example of customizable software and Matt's example of a tool with a specific application that will have direct and immediate impact on classroom instruction are the type of technology I am willing to invest. The key to technology investment, in an ideal world, would be a flexible system where each teacher could pick and choose what technology they need and would use in their classroom. It sounds great, but this flexible spending plan is not acceptable to the policy makers and appropriation committees.
Isn't professional development a critical part of what separates the good teachers from the great ones? As a future administrator, isn't professional growth something we should expect from our staff? During a teacher evaluation, should I ask, "Do you have 5 years of teaching experience or do you have 1 year of teaching experience 5 times?"
Is it unreasonable to expect that a teacher would want to take ownership of their own professional development? If a teacher knows that they want to improve in a specific area, shouldn't that teacher develop an opportunity for improvement plan?
Let me use a sports analogy and I don't mean to offend anyone so I apologize in advance. During the season, (football, basketball, field hockey, lacrosse, baseball, tennis, golf, etc.) athletes perform at their highest level possible. The season may last several months. During the season, most athletes perform "maintenance" exercises to maintain their performance level. Most athletes know that during the season, because of wear and tear on the body, there may be a drop off in performance as the season goes on. This is why athletes perform maintenance exercises so there is not a noticeable drop off of performance. During the season, the athletes "give it all" until the season comes to an end. Soon thereafter they take a break from their respective sport and reflect back on the past season. Then they get ready for their "professional development" program or some know it as off season training.
They analyze their performance from the previous year and identify areas for improvement. They develop a "workout" plan that incorporates exercises for the "areas for improvement". They implement their workout plan with the goal of returning for the next season better prepared and in better shape. Better preparation and being in better shape in most cases translates into more playing time, more recognition, fewer injuries and higher performance level.
I know that someone make take offense to comparing athletes and teachers for various reasons, but both groups are professionals. Both groups get paid to perform. So I guess my question is, if you are getting paid as a professional (regardless of salary level), should you have an off season training program that brings you back for the new season better prepared and in better shape?
I am of the opinion that we may be spending too much money and placing too much emphasis on technology in the classroom. Don’t get me wrong technology is important and anything that helps teachers do their job better I’m for it but bottom line is, just as always, it’s going to fall back on the teacher. What kind of technology are TEACHERS interested in? If teachers do not feel technology is relevant or if it is not easy to use, it’s a waste of money.
I think ideally that educational technology would be invested and then have direct impact to student learning. The problem is that technology is constantly changing and morphing into something new. Therefore, let's say a school buys a computer software, sees improvement in student achievement, then the next yearh comes up and they want to invest again. Many times the software will become more expensive and or change so that it is no longer effective. Or it doesn't have the same impact for the money. This is similar to the changing of the lights experiment in psychology. Once the new wow factor is gone, the students achievement gains go down or reverse. Therfore, schools are always looking for the new wow which requires more training and money that could be spent on something else.
In order to excite teachers about receiving training on new technology, I would share student achievement data from other schools that used the proposed technology. Additionally, I would share best-practices research reading materials that validate my claims. I firmly believe that the Office of Professional Development should provide all of the technology training. To minimize the number of people receiving training from the Office of Professional Development, the district could implement the “train-the-trainer” model. By using the Office of Professional Development, the district will save a tremendous amount of money over time by not sending employees to workshops outside of the district. In certain situations, I would collaborate with the PTA to identify funds to hire technology experts to present to staff members. Moreover, I believe that the most effect professional development is job embed. Teachers should utile their newly discovered technology skills to deliver daily classroom instruction. Teachers’ delivery methods and student academic achievement results should be shared at their weekly Professional Learning Community.
To answer the follow up question, I hope the future of education is not moving completely to a software driven educational system. Not to say that certain problems in education don't call for the use of some high quality software programs. However going down this road to often I feel will water down the whole educational system and create robots. Essentially what you would have are several software companies developing educational software for all the schools across the nation. Do we really want to remove the creativity of the individual teacher? If you want to do something for that second grade teacher spend the money on a new 2nd grade teacher or adopt some type of inclusion model that will help her address some of her differentiated instruction with slower or EC learners.
I would say in many cases its worth the money but in some it is not. The world is changing and a major reason for that is the advancement of technology. We need to make sure that our students are up to date with the changing world of the 21st century.
On the flip side, if you look at studies that intel whether or not technology and professional development have had a major impact on student achievement, the studies indicate there is no substantial difference. So if you base an answer off of this data, then you could conclude that the money spent on these services has been a waste.
I have trouble when I have to fight with my students all day long to put away their phones and stop texting which they can do blind folded but at the same time I have students all the time raise their hands and ask me, sometimes very nicely, would I please use English when I’m writing in cursive on the board! I think technology has gotten educators away from some of the basics. Before scantron machines were in the schools, tests answers were hand written, if your teacher couldn’t read your answer it was a problem. Many of my kids don’t know how to use a dictionary…they tell me they can just look it up online.
I believe that technology is very important in public education. I am lucky to work at a school where technology is an important part of the school's culture. We have four labs that each house 32 computers. When we were doing the online computer test, we would test two teams at a time. Rather than taking weeks to get all of our students tested, it took 3 days. Last year, we even tested all of our 7th graders. With the new writing assessment for 7th grade, our teachers (4) can take their classes down to the computer labs to type their papers. Papers are written and printed out in two days rather than finishing them whenever the teacher can sign up for the lab. Every classroom at my school has an activ board and LCD projector, as well as the remotes that students use to input answers and every teacher has a laptop. People in positions like mine have docking stations for their laptops with flatscreen monitors that are large. Printers are in every office, and every team has a printer in one of the rooms on their team. We use technology in many ways at our school including posting assignments for parents, newsletters, correspondence, creating powerpoints, accessing Renzulli Learning which all of our students use in Science, and posting forms and lesson plans to our Carrington staff folder for employees to access when they are looking for something specific. I definitely feel that the expenditure for technology is well worth it!
ReplyDeleteTechnology is worth it when there is a "professional development plan" for the end users. In a lot of situations, teachers are given technological tools without the training and then are expected to "learn" the technology on their own. Some will. Most will not.
ReplyDeleteIf you are going to spend the money, please include funds for ongoing professional development.
Yes, technology is a worthy investment for school districts. In an effect to ensure fiscal accountability, the district should establish processes and procedures that justify expenditures. The district’s Office of Professional Development should provide all of the professional development opportunities for technology. Moreover, teachers should use technology to perform their daily routine responsibilities, deliver classroom instruction, and engage student in learning through hands-on experiences.
ReplyDeleteI agree with others that technology is a good investment for teachers and students if the technology is actually utilized. One of the best ways to ensure use is by providing professional development so that teachers understand how to effectively improve instruction by using technology for student engagement, data tracking and analysis, etc. I also think that careful thought and consideration should be given when considering when new technology will be provided within a school or district to ensure that money is not being wasted.
ReplyDeleteI wonder if we can change the question and ask how technology supports the learning environment?
ReplyDeleteI am going to be brave here and say that no, technology is currently not worth the billions that we are putting into it. There are several points that support my opinion, but as an elementary school teacher, I will say that technology is not too useful if students are lacking basic skills to interface with it. Once students have these basic social and academic skills, go for it. However, from my experience, I see students who can not even decode words properly act all to eagerly to get on the computer and put the cart before the horse. And even in this example, yes, there are programs that help with this skill, but from my experience, they are not always successful. I think that as educators, we need to use a variety of instructional modes and not be too quick to jump on the bandwagon of the "latest and greatest" technological tool to improve student achievement. Once we have those basic academic skills, like critical thinking, we can learn how to integrate technology. How many of you went to school in the days before computers were everywhere? You did just fine, didn't you? The reason for that is that you were equipped with basic learning and thinking skills so that once you encountered a new object, material, or concept, you were able to integrate it into your prior knowledge.
ReplyDeleteCamille: I am jealous of all the computer labs you have. We have one lab, and benchmarks/computer based assessments mean the computer lab is not available for instructional purposes for at least a month.
ReplyDeleteKeith: I understand and agree with your assessment that most teachers will not use the tools. I believe the avoidance to integrate technology by educators makes the administrators job to keep them accountable even more important. If the administrator emphasizes and models the importance of technology, then expectations to see technology in the classroom will only help the students. Unfortunately, not all admin's follow through on the accountability aspect.
I have an interactive classroom. My instructional differentiation has reached unimaginable heights due to the technology I have. I also believe it has directly contributed to my students' success on the 8th Grade Science EOG. So, based upon my experience, I definitely think the expenditure on technology is worth it.
We live in a technology driven world where knowing how to interact with technology is becoming a necessary basic skill. Therefore, technology should be integrated as much as possible to prepare students for the world that we live in. I personally did not have much experience with technology in school but there was also not a self-check out at the grocery store or computer-based job applications. Some technology is not appropriate in every environment and will likely not yield the results that we (educators) would like. However, there are tools that can be utilized that make lessons more relevant and provide hands-on ways for students to engage in material. I believe that these tools are needed and worth the investment.
ReplyDeleteI also went from a school that provided an LCD projector for every classroom to a school that provides one per team. This may not seem like much but I have to tell you that it does make a difference. There are so many neat things available on the web that are useful in the classroom. I miss being able to jump on at any moment and show my students something from the internet that is relevant to my lesson.
ReplyDeleteTechnology supports the learning environment at my school tremendously. Some of the ways would include Renzulli Learning. Our students are learning so much about themselves and how they like to learn, as well as being directed to worthwhile websites that enhance whatever they are learning in their classrooms. Another way is the use of the activ board by the teachers and the students. In a math class, for a teacher to be able to click on one little icon and then draw any geometric shape she needs is amazing. We do who units on our laptops and then use our projectors to share with the class. Having an author read a book aloud while the book is on the activ board is very cool. The kids love the way the pages turn with the readers voice. We are provided with extensive professional development on all that can be done with this technology, and at every staff meeting, a teacher shows us something he /she has discovered that we might not have found yet. Great use of money at my school!
ReplyDeleteI must agree with what Justin has posted. Often it seems, technology is purchased and a plan is created for implementing it within the school. Take for instance the implementation of Smartboards. In some schools that I have read about, teachers have received Smartboards and training. The training has taught teachers to "use" the program. As I read about what teachers are "doing" with the technology, it seems as if instead of writing on a "twentieth century" whiteboard, that teachers are writing on a "digital" white board and showing movie clips on a larger screen. Technology staff development must go beyond learning to simply "use" the technology. Instead technology professional development must help teachers to design instruction that better engages students than typical instructional strategies. Furthermore, teachers not only need to use the technology to improve and enhance instruction but also need the skills necessary to empower students to meaningfully utilize the technology. Until systems and ongoing resources are designed to facilitate the meaningful inclusion of technology, it seems to me that money could be better spent in other areas.
ReplyDeleteYes, it is worth it. I agree with many of the responses already. How else are we going to prepare our students to be globably competitive in the 21st century? We live in a world now where practically everything that we do requires the use of technology. We would be doing our students an injustice if we did not consider this to be a big investment that is absolutely needed. Not only that, but teachers and principals should model the use of it. I do agree, however, that there must be procedures in place to hold teachers and principals accountable and to justify the need. I agree with Amatullah in saying that some technology is not appropriately fitted for every classroom, and therefore we must be careful that it will enhance and not hinder learning.
ReplyDeleteJustan, I agree that there are some basic concepts and skills that students simply cannot get through the use of technology. Again, we must make sure that we are using technology to enhance learning. As a computer teacher,I see this daily where students do not have the basic reading, writing and math skills and what a challenge it becomes when the course curriculum requires that they be able to create and format letters, read sample stories in training computers for speech recognition and create spreadsheets using formulas.
ReplyDeleteAlso, having classroom management software in my lab makes it somewhat better because now students are not distracted as much with the internet.
I agree that when technology is used correctly it can be beneficial. I, like Brianna, have seen teachers use their Activ Boards as glorified white boards, and it is sad because it is such a waste. I have also seen teachers be very effective with their white boards. I believe that it all depends on how they are used. At our school we have two computer labs with twenty five computers in them each, and we also have two lap top carts that can be checked out for use in the classroom. There has also been talk of creating another lab for strict use in implementing Renzulli with classes. It worries me, though, because technology is very expensive and so many students do not know the fundamentals of using computers, and, once again, it seems to be a waste of money. If students were to be efficient with technology, then I would agree that money used would be worth it.
ReplyDeleteBriana, I spelled your name wrong...I'm sorry.
ReplyDeleteI tend to lean more towards Justin's thinking. While I believe technology can be a great tool, I rarely see it used to actually support student learning, any more than the glorified white board.
ReplyDeleteI think we could use computers to differentiate instruction and stop tracking kids into segregated classrooms, but that doesn't seem to be happening. I did see computers used for online college classes which was cool. And in a charter school they had independent testing programs that gave students immediate feedback. But I have yet to see that used in the regular public schools. When I asked teachers in Durham about the program (I forget the name at the moment) they had not heard of it.
I don't know, so this is a question for HS teachers...do the schools offer any computer programming or web page design programs?
Finally, while seeing the pictures of a book has benefits, I'd rather get professional development on storytelling.
I agree with the others that technology is a worthy investment for school districts. When technology is integrated in the curriculum I think it helps the students in the learning process since they are engaged in high order thinking and problem solving. Technology also promotes project based learning. I know that there are situations when districts spend tons of money on technology and it gets wasted. For example, when smart/active boards are in classrooms and the teachers do not know how to work them. (The teachers are waiting for the training.) Also, I know of situations where the schools have purchased licenses for programs like Accelerated Reader and the teachers have no idea the program exists. Amatullah, I agree there should be thought and consideration given of when, how and to whom new technology will be provided within a school or district to ensure that money is not wasted.
ReplyDeleteI have to agree with Justin, I do not think that the amount of money spent each year on technology is worth it. Justin makes a really good point about how most of us learned without technology when we were in school. I never used a computer on a daily basis until my freshmen year in college. I think that people are under the assumption that the amount of money spent on technology each year equals smarter students, brighter futures, and more opportunities. Although I’m sure there might be evidence somewhere that validates this point, I strongly feel that the fundamentals of good ole hard work, discipline, and parental accountability are far less expensive, and much more beneficial.
ReplyDeleteWhile the money being spent on technology may be exorbitant, I still believe the technology can be a tremendous asset to student learning. I guess my argument is not necessarily whether the students have the basic skills to utilize the technology, but more on how much teachers are employing the tools. I realize that technology is not the only way to deliver effective instruction, especially since most of us were educated without technology. As Debra said, the world these kids live in has become completely full of gadets/technology which further supports education with on their terms. IF used appropriately with some lesson preparedness, then technology enhances daily instruction dramatically. Furthermore, as a future administrator will you hold people accountable for using the technology that is available? Will you not integrate technology and become part of this new movement in educating today's youth? How will you use your allotment of technological funds if you do not believe technology is worth it?
ReplyDeleteI agree with all who have stated that educators must be held accountable concerning technology. There are certainly situations in which technology purchases are irresponsible - mainly because teachers do not receive training or understand how it relates to the standard course of study.
ReplyDeleteThat said, I had the opportunity to witness firsthand how technology can improve education. I observed Hillside New Tech for a day last month. I saw freshmen teams developing a website that focused on their earth science lessons. The teams communicate with each other about collaborative projects over email. They develop presentations using Macs in English class. I know it's costly, and most schools cannot afford these resources, but these students are better prepared that many to compete globally after graduation.
I like Adam's reframing of the question as focusing on how technology can support the learning environment (you'll hear much more from him on Wednesday).
ReplyDeleteSeveral people have mentioned anecdotal examples of technology being used effectively in the classroom to extend learning opportunities. Here's my next question: were those examples about the technology or about the teacher? Without the technology, would those teachers have still figured out effective ways for students to learn?
I guess my point boils down to this question: does technology make teachers more effective (does it support learning environments across the board), or is it only effective in the hands of an effective teacher, who was already going to achieve high levels of learning anyway?
Dr. G
Technology is only a waste if it is not properly used to its full potential. From my experience technology is used more at the secondary level than the elementary level. I have observed numerous elementary classroom teachers and rarely is technology used, unless you are including overhead projectors as technology. I have yet to see an elementary teacher utilizing a Smart Board in their classroom, but I know that the schools have them. It all boils down to the teachers in the school and if they see any value in using technology. Just as some people try to keep up with the Jones, some schools try to keep up with other schools that have the latest technology gadgets. Just as others have stated accountability is key here along with properly training the staff on how to use it. There are schools out there with Smart Boards that are not being used. Why do we keep them then? Sell them to a school that really utilizes them or continue to have it sit in the corner as an after thought in hope that someone will use it.
ReplyDeleteTechnology is a tool. A tool is only as good as the person using it. A basketball in my hands is just recreational but in the hands of LeBron James it is millions of dollars. Same basketball, different people, therefore technology can only be effective in the hands of an effective teacher.
ReplyDeleteOf course the money spent on technology is worth it! I have seen in my lifetime how technology has tremendously impacted education. The internet has developed to become a major vehicle for educational research for students as well as an avenue for intstruction (blackboard for example). Also, cell phones have become a major issue and part of life in our school changing our discipline policies and the things we have to deal with. Technology is shrinking boundary lines and making communication faster and easier to transact business and do everything and our kids need to know technology to keep up educationally. School districts should certainly keep spending money.
ReplyDeleteI think technology can make a teacher more effective, but I do believe a teacher can be effective without technology. As Lamont said, technology is a tool. However, a critical tool...
ReplyDeleteIt's so critical for teachers and students to keep up with technology because of its widespread use in our world. Our world is now so fast-paced and wanting instant gratification and technology aids this.
For instance, a teacher can and should teach students to do math without technology, i.e. with formulas, proofs, etc. However, the calculator made everything so much easier. Many students now will not or feel they cannot do math without a calculator. Thus, techonolgy has impacted our students' view of education and we teachers have to educate them based on their view.
I hope this makes sense, but I think we must use techonogy because it is so entranched in these new generations of students.
Dr. G., you said, "I guess my point boils down to this question: does technology make teachers more effective (does it support learning environments across the board), or is it only effective in the hands of an effective teacher, who was already going to achieve high levels of learning anyway?" I think that technology does make teachers more effective across the board, IF, as Matt stated the teachers take responsibility for the technology. If you have an activ board, and refuse to go to the training and/or try some of the newfangled ideas with your students, than, no, it's not worth it. At my school, we have some very effective teachers who are afraid of all technology! So, even though they have access to this technology, they choose not to use it. In my opinion, technology does enhance classrooms and learning if the teachers will learn how to use effectively, and will use it for more than showing movies. Students are "turned on" by technology, so we as educators should be using it just to show how important technology is in their world, and how like us, they will have opportunities to grow and learn as they become productive adults. My students still can't believe that calculators and CDs didn't exist when I was their age. Camille
ReplyDeleteI think that technology is needed in the classroom as students will need to know how to utilize technology, especially in today’s society where it dominates every aspect of life. However, I do not feel that technology should be the center or focus of student’s learning. In other words, students should not be made to rely heavily on technology. I think that teachers are not doing a good job of teaching students the basic formulas, concepts, and skills because they are letting the calculators and computers do the thinking for the students. Some teachers, (young teachers) are taught in college to rely heavily on technology, so they know no other way to teach. Therefore, the teachers are not equipped to assist students based solely on what they know; instead, they have to run to the computer for help. In the prehistoric days before computers and TI-83 Calculators, teachers were proficient in their subject area and could teach well without the use of multiple gadgets and the students learned and did well relying on their own intellect.. While understandably the government wants students to be able to compete in a global and technological society, they are creating students who rely heavily on electronic tools because the curriculum has been dumb down. On one hand, the government is helping students and teachers to be technology savvy, but on the other hand, the government is creating technology junkies who would be lost and incapable without technology. So, I’m straddling the fence on this issue. I think it is worth the expenditure but not to the magnitude that it has become.
ReplyDeleteTo answer Dr. G's question, I think technology makes good teachers better and makes bad teachers lazy because now they have something to hide behind rather than perfecting their craft so that they can be skilled with or without technology.
ReplyDeleteDoes technology improve students' abilities to read, write, think, and problem solve? Does technology improve test scores? Does technology create active or passive learners? If the answers to these questions are "no”,” maybe", or "don't know" then I would argue that the expenditures for technology are not worth it. If the number one factor in student achievement is effective teachers, then we need to invest in human resources not infrastructure and hardware. I understand that technology is important to being productive members of the 21st century, but I have a hard time thinking that technology is the panacea to all of the schools' problems when the average high school student cannot read and comprehend a user manual. It seems that technology has become a tangible investment in education and has become the essential aid in improving student achievement. School Boards and other politicians appropriate money for technology and then brag and boast in their campaign rhetoric that their schools have x number of computer labs, smart boards, LCD projectors and so on. As Keith pointed out, if the purchase of technology does not include funding and a plan for staff development then it will not be used effectively. A recent study at Duke showed that student test scores dropped from their 4th grade scores to their 8th grade scores after they acquired computers and internet access during the interim. Technology is a tool that used properly can help effective teachers; used improperly it can be a distraction that hinders learning.
ReplyDeleteLet me clarify something because I feel that my comments made be misconstrued as if I'm against technology usage in classrooms; I'm not against technology usage at all. Of course students need to know how to operate and utilize technology, especially in this society; however I'm against technology being overused to the point that it handicaps students and makes them dependent upon it to the point that they can not think for themselves.
ReplyDeleteWell sais Paul!
ReplyDeleteIn reframing the question, the answer seems be that technology is not worth the cost. If most people agree that technology does not improve average or poor teaching, then is giving poor or average teachers a smart board going to help them improve student scores? As a teacher at a school with older infrastructure, I would laugh when new teachers from newer schools come in and complain because they did not have a piece of equipment they “could not teach without”.
ReplyDeleteWhat is a better activity for a child; to watch TV (use technology) or have a book read to them? Which is better the novel or the movie based on the novel? Does using a computer to teach writing help a student who does not know how to type? When I began teaching we used filmstrip projectors, overhead projectors, 16mm movie projectors, copy machines, and mimeograph machines. Students learned the majority of their content from reading books, taking notes, listening to lectures and discussions. The students I teach today are technologically savvy with their Ipods, cell phones and texting, but they struggle to read the textbook that is appropriate for their grade level. How is technology helping them? They have become dependent on technology to the point that even my “honor” students do not understand that cutting and pasting from Wikipedia and other websites to their research paper is plagiarism when they do not quote and cite the paragraphs they borrow. Matt gave an ideal example of how technology should look when used properly in a classroom; but until more students are at grade level in their basic skills, the school expenditure in technology is just another example of throwing money at the problems of education. I am not a Luddite, but I do feel that the educational system has been duped by the educational supply companies and technology companies into believing that technology will make us smarter. Technology does not make us smarter it makes some things easier and more efficient.
To answer Dr. G. I do not believe that technology makes better teachers. I think the astute teacher will use technology to support learning in her or his classroom, but without technology, s/he will find other ways to support learning.
ReplyDeleteWhat I find amazing is that most students are why ahead of me with programming IPODS, downloading music, using the social structures of technology but many have read less than 1 complete book/year. And, as I beieve it was Paul that pointed this out, would be hard pressed to read the instruction manual.
While computers (our primary technology in the classroom) may make things easier for students and teachers - and are great for communication and editing, it does not seem they are helping them learn how to learn.
To the original question, "Is the expenditure worth it? Why or why not?"
ReplyDeleteIt is worth it as long as we're not buying technology just for the sake of buying technology.
Does that make sense?
In other words, it's not just HAVING smartboard technology in every single classroom, but actually using it in a meaningful way in our instruction. It is all in how you utilize it, but technology has the capacity to be extremely impactful to both the student and teacher.
To Dr. G's second question...IF technology alone were enough to make teachers (both the good and the bad) more effective, then we could probably just take attendance, fire up the data projector, press play on the Powerpoint, leave the room, and every child would be successful. Right? Doesn't work that way.
ReplyDeleteAn effective teacher is going to be effective regardless of the technology (or lack thereof) in their classroom.
In response to Dr. Graham’s question, I do think that technology can make teachers more effective. However, I also think that there are several other components that contribute to teacher effectiveness. The scope of technology just seems to have a much larger impact on how teachers can teach. Lastly, if technology is not accompanied with staff development, teachers cannot be held accountable for not using it within their classrooms.
ReplyDeleteThe big issue with me and for me as a future building level administrator is having staff development with the technology to assist the teacher in the delivery of his or her curriculum.
ReplyDeleteI would also encourage the teachers to design "instructions that are engaging" (thanks Briana) before going wild with technology in the classroom.
As it has been stated by others, technology is just a tool to assist teachers in the delivery of the curriculum. It should not be a "replacement" for effective teaching.
To Dr. G's last question, I agree with Lamont. The right tool in the right hands can work wonders. And the right tool in the hands of an effective teacher, will allow that teacher to do so much more within the classroom and with the students, time permitting.
ReplyDeleteThe fact is that we live in a technology-driven world. As educators, I believe one of our jobs is to prepare our students to be productive citizens. Due to the fact that our lives and jobs are SO technology driven, part of preparing our students to be productive citizens is exposing them to and teaching them about technology. Some of our students would not have access to technology if they did not have exposure in school. Therefore, I believe that they money that we spend on technology is necessary.
ReplyDeleteI wholeheartedly agree with the theme of the comments being made. Technology rarely improves teacher effectiveness. Good teachers can teach effectively using technology and less effective teachers are no more effective with technology that without it. (Has anyone proven this true when a server goes down?)
ReplyDeleteEven with my agreement with the essence of this discussion, here is an idea that challenges my opinions. Two years ago, I heard David Warlick speak. (davidwarlick.com) Warlick is a public speaker and technology teacher. The essence of his message was that students today are different. We are preparing them to be successful in a world that will require them to use technology that we cannot yet fathom. Although we (quality teachers) can be effective without fully utilizing technology in everything we teach and facilitate, is this fair to students? By not more fully utilizing digital movies, allowing cell phone texting, teaching all lessons with a smartboard component, providing ipods, etc., are we not, in some way, preventing students from existing and communicating in a way that is defining to them?
(This is my recollection of a keynote address I heard Warlick give.)
Although I agree effective teaching is not fully dependent on technology, even in the twenty first century, by not gravitating more and more to utilizing technology, could it be possible that we are missing the opportunity to connect with kids "where they are" and in the technological world they have known their entire lives?
I'm curious if anyone else is "wrestling" with this conundrum.
It is not that I think that we should not invest in technology at all. However, I do feel that our LEVEL of investment is too high. There are other things that we could do to improve student achievement that we know would have a positive effect besides buying additional technology beyond our current level. We could spend those funds for capital improvement, class size reductions, more professional development for teachers, experiential learning for students (field trips), and the list could go on and on.
ReplyDeleteI think that Dr. G. brought up a good point. Is technology going to make a mediocre teacher great? I think the odds are against that. In that case, you end up with a so so teacher with excellent technology that is in their classroom that is never used. I do agree with several classmates that development is critical--teachers must recieve training, support, and TIME to think of ways to integrate the resources they have been given.
We must remember that technology is not the END, but a means to an end. However, it is not the ONLY way to get to the end of student achievement.
I think that Justin has a valid point. Although I still believe it is our obligation to prepare our students to be global citizens, I do think we have to be careful how we spend our money. We need to fund the basics: computers for the school, LCD projectors (which, in my opinion, is a basic), etc.
ReplyDeleteI am not a proponent of outfitting every classroom with a Smartboard (or something similar), because, as Justin said, I do not think that such technology makes a mediocre teacher great. I DO, however, think that technology can make a GOOD teacher BETTER. I think we need to be careful about the technology that we buy, and be sure that we are placing it in the hands of teachers and staff that will USE it to benefit student achievement. We need to be careful not to fall prey to the latest fad, and instead, make wise choices about the needs of the school, the staff, and the students. I think those needs will vary by building, and part of being an effective leader is being able to diagnose those needs.
As usual, it all depends. It seems like many of us have very different opinions about the value of technology. As a high school math teacher I would love to have access to more technology. For instance, Texas Instruments sells a Navigator System that allows teachers to view the graphing calculator screens for 32 students. Teachers are able to check for mastery at all times. The cost...$3,750. Is it worth it? What if 1 student passes the EOC because of this technology? What about 2? What about 5?
ReplyDeleteThe technology issue raises challenges that are common in education. It's difficult to measure success, the purpose of education is unclear, and there is a great disconnect among teachers, researchers and policy makers.
To answer Adam’s question—technology can support the learning environment greatly, when used the right way. Students will learn without technology, and teachers can teach without it, but why would you want to do that? Not only does it not make sense, but it only impairs the learning of the students in the long run. They need to know how to do the basic fundamentals on a computer, so why not start while they are in school instead of producing students who are not ready for a technological driven society?
ReplyDeleteI think that, as Abbey said, our students need to be prepared for the world we are sending them in, and that requires basic (or more) use of technology. When looking at the statistics of my school, less than a half of the students have an actual computer in their house, and of those less than half have access to the internet. I know they are elementary school children, but this is where the basics of technology are learned. By giving them this exposure at school, we are preparing them for what's to greet them in the real world. I believe that the money we spend on them for this purpose is worth it, as long as the teachers are using it effectively, which is (or should be) a requirement for everyone. Schools that spend exorbitant amounts of money on technology should be able to justify that the teachers know how to use the items for the benefits of the students.
In response to Dr. G’s question, I think that technology is only effective in the hands of an effective teacher who is already achieving high levels of learning. I think teachers should only use technology to enrich skills and objectives they have already taught and students have mastered. These are the teachers that use technology for project based activities.
ReplyDeleteIn response to Lamont’s comment, “I have observed numerous elementary classroom teachers and rarely is technology used, unless you are including overhead projectors as technology.” I also have observed numerous elementary teachers. I have seen other forms of technology being used such as the alpha smarts, PowerPoint and smart boards. I agree that it boils down to the teachers in the school and if they see any value in using the technology that is available to them.
I think that article on disruptive technology makes a lot of sense. I've become a little (very little) familiar with the i-schools, which are online high schools (yes, in Idaho :-)) and I see that concept is becoming more widespread. My concern is that those programs are mainly reaching kids who parents have a certain amount of resources, already. My hope is that we find a way to provide those programs to kids that may have more difficulty with access
ReplyDeleteBecause technology (1) provides teachers with an additional opportunity to differentiate classroom instruction, (2) increases student engagement, (3) mastery must be demonstrated for high school graduation, and (4) prepares students for success in higher education, I believe that technology makes teachers more effective across the board.
ReplyDeleteTwo comments/questions.
ReplyDeleteIt seems as though every time I throw out a question on just about any topic, one of the answers is "Well, we definitely need to make sure we give teachers adequate professional development on this." When is all this awesome professional development going to occur? Who's going to pay for it? Who's going to sit through it? How psyched would you be if your principal was throwing a new series of workshops at you every month? The research is pretty clear that professional development is rarely effective in changing behaviors, it costs a lot of money, and it takes a lot of time. Be careful of falling into the trap of thinking that any problem or issue can be solved with a little professional development.
Second thought. A 2nd grade teacher with 25 students is hard-pressed to provide differentiated learning opportunities for every child. But a high-quality software program can easily customize a learning experience for individual kids, and K-12 software is getting better all the time. Is that the future of technology? Is that where we should be spending technology dollars?
Dr. G
I think that technology should be like all educational tools and be individualized. Obviously college prep students need the technology to compete and effectively complete research projects compared to our international counterparts. I also agree with Paul though in that we are spending billions of dollars on some of our students who will never own a computer and are struggling to read and write on grade level. Of course the big problem with educational tools is that they become trendy. Everyone has to have a PC. Everyone has to have a Mac. I remember a few years ago, everyone needed a palm pilot. The trends come and go and while the college bound students need to keep up with current trends, our struggling students need someone to invest in reading programs and tutors to help them learn some basic skills to compete in this changing world.
ReplyDeleteDr. G, I think that an effective teacher can customize a differentiated learning experience without a high-quality software program. I hope the future of technology is not just for customizing individual learning experiences. I think that the technology money should be spent on remediation programs for low performing students.
ReplyDeleteDr. G's example of customizable software and Matt's example of a tool with a specific application that will have direct and immediate impact on classroom instruction are the type of technology I am willing to invest. The key to technology investment, in an ideal world, would be a flexible system where each teacher could pick and choose what technology they need and would use in their classroom. It sounds great, but this flexible spending plan is not acceptable to the policy makers and appropriation committees.
ReplyDeleteDr. G,
ReplyDeleteIsn't professional development a critical part of what separates the good teachers from the great ones? As a future administrator, isn't professional growth something we should expect from our staff? During a teacher evaluation, should I ask, "Do you have 5 years of teaching experience or do you have 1 year of teaching experience 5 times?"
Is it unreasonable to expect that a teacher would want to take ownership of their own professional development? If a teacher knows that they want to improve in a specific area, shouldn't that teacher develop an opportunity for improvement plan?
Let me use a sports analogy and I don't mean to offend anyone so I apologize in advance. During the season, (football, basketball, field hockey, lacrosse, baseball, tennis, golf, etc.) athletes perform at their highest level possible. The season may last several months. During the season, most athletes perform "maintenance" exercises to maintain their performance level. Most athletes know that during the season, because of wear and tear on the body, there may be a drop off in performance as the season goes on. This is why athletes perform maintenance exercises so there is not a noticeable drop off of performance. During the season, the athletes "give it all" until the season comes to an end. Soon thereafter they take a break from their respective sport and reflect back on the past season. Then they get ready for their "professional development" program or some know it as off season training.
They analyze their performance from the previous year and identify areas for improvement. They develop a "workout" plan that incorporates exercises for the "areas for improvement". They implement their workout plan with the goal of returning for the next season better prepared and in better shape. Better preparation and being in better shape in most cases translates into more playing time, more recognition, fewer injuries and higher performance level.
I know that someone make take offense to comparing athletes and teachers for various reasons, but both groups are professionals. Both groups get paid to perform. So I guess my question is, if you are getting paid as a professional (regardless of salary level), should you have an off season training program that brings you back for the new season better prepared and in better shape?
I am of the opinion that we may be spending too much money and placing too much emphasis on technology in the classroom. Don’t get me wrong technology is important and anything that helps teachers do their job better I’m for it but bottom line is, just as always, it’s going to fall back on the teacher. What kind of technology are TEACHERS interested in? If teachers do not feel technology is relevant or if it is not easy to use, it’s a waste of money.
ReplyDeleteI think ideally that educational technology would be invested and then have direct impact to student learning. The problem is that technology is constantly changing and morphing into something new. Therefore, let's say a school buys a computer software, sees improvement in student achievement, then the next yearh comes up and they want to invest again. Many times the software will become more expensive and or change so that it is no longer effective. Or it doesn't have the same impact for the money. This is similar to the changing of the lights experiment in psychology. Once the new wow factor is gone, the students achievement gains go down or reverse. Therfore, schools are always looking for the new wow which requires more training and money that could be spent on something else.
ReplyDeleteIn order to excite teachers about receiving training on new technology, I would share student achievement data from other schools that used the proposed technology. Additionally, I would share best-practices research reading materials that validate my claims. I firmly believe that the Office of Professional Development should provide all of the technology training. To minimize the number of people receiving training from the Office of Professional Development, the district could implement the “train-the-trainer” model. By using the Office of Professional Development, the district will save a tremendous amount of money over time by not sending employees to workshops outside of the district. In certain situations, I would collaborate with the PTA to identify funds to hire technology experts to present to staff members. Moreover, I believe that the most effect professional development is job embed. Teachers should utile their newly discovered technology skills to deliver daily classroom instruction. Teachers’ delivery methods and student academic achievement results should be shared at their weekly Professional Learning Community.
ReplyDeleteTo answer the follow up question, I hope the future of education is not moving completely to a software driven educational system. Not to say that certain problems in education don't call for the use of some high quality software programs. However going down this road to often I feel will water down the whole educational system and create robots. Essentially what you would have are several software companies developing educational software for all the schools across the nation. Do we really want to remove the creativity of the individual teacher? If you want to do something for that second grade teacher spend the money on a new 2nd grade teacher or adopt some type of inclusion model that will help her address some of her differentiated instruction with slower or EC learners.
ReplyDeleteI would say in many cases its worth the money but in some it is not. The world is changing and a major reason for that is the advancement of technology. We need to make sure that our students are up to date with the changing world of the 21st century.
ReplyDeleteOn the flip side, if you look at studies that intel whether or not technology and professional development have had a major impact on student achievement, the studies indicate there is no substantial difference. So if you base an answer off of this data, then you could conclude that the money spent on these services has been a waste.
I have trouble when I have to fight with my students all day long to put away their phones and stop texting which they can do blind folded but at the same time I have students all the time raise their hands and ask me, sometimes very nicely, would I please use English when I’m writing in cursive on the board! I think technology has gotten educators away from some of the basics. Before scantron machines were in the schools, tests answers were hand written, if your teacher couldn’t read your answer it was a problem. Many of my kids don’t know how to use a dictionary…they tell me they can just look it up online.
ReplyDelete